COMPARITIVE ANALYSIS OF RESULTS ON 2D NUMERICAL BASEMENT MODEL OF WATER FLOW ON MODEL CASES

Authors

  • Michal Pavlíček Brno University of Technology, Faculty of Civil Engineering, Veveří 331/95, 602 00 Brno, Czech Republic
  • Aleš Dráb Vysoké učení technické v Brně, Fakulta stavební, Veveří 331/95, 602 00 Brno, Česká republika
  • Petr Lukášek Brno University of Technology, Faculty of Civil Engineering, Veveří 331/95, 602 00 Brno, Czech Republic

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.51704/cjce.2016.vol2.iss2.pp132-138

Keywords:

BASEMENT, 2D numerical simulation, factual and numerical accuracy

Abstract

The article describes comparison of results on 2D numerical BASEMENT model with analytical solution and physical experimental testing. Test case of the analytical solution was water flow over bump in rectangular channel with transition from a sub-critical to a super-critical flow regime over the bump. Area of the simulation of experimental test case was made of channel which was divided by partition into two parts. There was an opening in the partition and there was different water depth in each channel part. Flow in the channel downstream the partition was influenced by an obstacle. Values of water depth and magnitude of the velocity were compared using comparative analysis.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

EDF – R&D: Telemac – 2D software manual, Version 6.1., EDF – R&D. 2010.

ENVIRONMENT AGENCY: Benchmarking the latest generation of 2D hydraulic modelling packages. Report – SC120002. 2013. ISBN 978-1-84911-306-9.

FELCMAN, J. Matematické modelování ve fyzice, KNM PRESS, Praha, 2004..

GOULDBY, B. Uncertainty and sensitivity analysis method for flood risk analysis. Report T024-10-07. FLOODsite Consortium. 2007.

LABORATORY OF HYDRAULICS, GLACIOLOGY AND HYDROLOGY (VAW). System manuals of BASEMENT, Version 2.6. ETH Zurich. 2016.

Published

2016-12-31

How to Cite

Pavlíček, M., Dráb, A. and Lukášek, P. (2016) “COMPARITIVE ANALYSIS OF RESULTS ON 2D NUMERICAL BASEMENT MODEL OF WATER FLOW ON MODEL CASES”, Czech Journal of Civil Engineering, 2(2), pp. 132-138. doi: 10.51704/cjce.2016.vol2.iss2.pp132-138.

Issue

Section

Articles